https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP
Study carefully.
Facebook.IG (think Ray.Chandler).
Twitter.
Etc…..
HONEYPOTS.
Q
Study carefully.
Facebook.IG (think Ray.Chandler).
Twitter.
Etc…..
HONEYPOTS.
Q
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed legislation aimed at penalizing website operators that facilitate online sex trafficking and chipping away at a legal protection for the technology industry.
The law is intended to make it easier for state prosecutors and sex-trafficking victims to sue social media networks, advertisers and others that kept exploitative material on their platforms, although victims would be required to show websites knowingly facilitated sex trafficking.The signing occurred as Washington sharpens its scrutiny on technology companies, which have largely evaded regulation, for their use of privacy protections and consumer data.
Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Facebook Inc, has been testifying before lawmakers this week. Silicon Valley has long opposed efforts to rewrite the Communications Decency Act, which protects companies from liability for content posted by their users and has been credited with fueling the sector’s growth for 20 years.However, Facebook and other technology companies and lobbying groups mostly withdrew opposition to the legislation in recent months after negotiating changes that limited the bill’s potential impact.Some technology companies fear the bill could signal more efforts to tighten regulation on the industry.
Law enforcement has lobbied for such legislation for years, and the bill had drawn support from Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter and a White House adviser.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP?il=0
http://globalpatriotnews.com/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking/
http://yournewswire.com/jeffrey-epstein-pedo-island-burns/
BACKGROUND
Last month, numerous outlets reported on Jeffrey Epstein’s salacious Florida trial being granted a stay by the appeals court.
According to a March 14th article on JDJournal:
“The famed sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein is set to go to trial but his legal team is pushing to get the trial delayed. The Palm Beach billionaire settled lawsuits against him from three teenage victims for $5.5 million. Epstein claims that he was persuaded to settle the claims by attorney Bradley Edwards and former attorney Scott Rothstein.
“The case between Epstein and Edwards was slated to begin Tuesday (3/13/18) in the Palm Beach County Circuit Court. After a round of appeals filed by Epstein’s attorneys Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach, the 4th District Court of Appeal granted a stay in the case.”
JDJournal also reported that since the trial was delayed, Epstein “has been spending most of his time on his private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.”
The island, which can be found on Google Maps, is officially named ‘Little St. James Island’:
Located on the southwest portion of the island is a strange temple-like structure and opening to a possible nefarious underground facility (Image Credits: Google):
Notable public figures, such as former President Bill Clinton, have been reported to travel with Epstein on his ‘Lolita Express’ to various places, including this private island.
According to a 2016 article on the New York Post:
“Epstein has spent the bulk of his adult life cultivating relationships with the world’s most powerful men. Flight logs show that from 2001 to 2003, Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private plane, dubbed ‘The Lolita Express’ by the press, 26 times. After Epstein’s arrest in July 2006, federal tax records show Epstein donated $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation that year.”
Another case, detailed in Wikipedia, involves Epstein as well as Prince Andrew from Britain and prominent American lawyer Alan Dershowitz:
“In January 2015, a 31-year-old American woman, Virginia Roberts, alleged in a sworn affidavit that at the age of 17, she had been held as a sex slave by Epstein. She further alleged that he had trafficked her to several people, including Prince Andrew and Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz. Roberts also claimed that Epstein and others had physically and sexually abused her.
“Roberts alleged that the FBI may have been involved in a cover-up. She said she had served as Epstein’s sex slave from 1999 to 2002 and had recruited other under-age girls. Prince Andrew, Epstein and Dershowitz all denied having had sex with Roberts. Dershowitz took legal action over the allegations. A diary purported to belong to Roberts was published online. Epstein entered an out-of-court settlement with Roberts, as he has done in several other lawsuits.
“The BBC television series ‘Panorama’ planned an investigation of the scandal. As of 2016 these claims had not been tested in any law court.”
Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, and Woody Allen are some other celebrities that have reportedly traveled and partied with Epstein in the past.
https://nypost.com/2016/10/09/the-sex-slave-scandal-that-exposed-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3688656/A-fully-equipped-dentist-s-chair-close-photos-young-girls-backsides-eerie-images-videotaped-walk-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-s-Florida-mansion.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3679023/Billionaire-sex-offender-Jeffrey-Epstein-claimed-helped-Clinton-Foundation-touted-close-relationship-former-president-plea-bargain-negotiations.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3589628/Report-Bill-Clinton-jumped-aboard-disgraced-sex-offender-Jeffrey-Epstein-s-Lolita-Express-plane-junkets-26-TIMES-just-three-years.html
#pedo #pedoisland #sexslaves #sexslave #epsteinisland #lolitaexpress #jefferyepstein #orgyisland #raychandler #rachelchandler #sextraffickingact
#trumpsignsbill #endpedo #facebook #markzuckerberg #congress #2daycongress #zuckerberg #privacyacr #censorship #conservatives #mewomanchildrenbabies #protecthumans #edhumantrafficking #endsexslaves #endchildtrafficking #endkidnapping #ms13gangs #protectsouthborders #caravan #illegals #children #woman #men #palmbeach #msdhighschool #parklandflorida #fisagate #fisamemo #nunesmemo #Q #Qanon #Anons #QArmy #QAlert #QPosts #QDrops
HoneyPots
https://attivonetworks.com/deception-technologies-are-much-more-than-dressed-up-honeypots/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwh7zWBRCiARIsAId9b4rLUZqRe8p3hOnlw3VdfwLW49f8eeMpwEHfhy3iHUx9hdZZwenWkXMaApmXEALw_wcB
With a growing number of companies looking to add deception as part of their layered security defense, it is fairly common for me to be at an event or talking with a prospect and be asked, “Isn’t deception technology just a DecoyDoc?” I can completely appreciate the misperception. At the most fundamental level, yes they are both designed to confuse, misdirect, and delay the enemy by incorporating ambiguity and by misdirecting their operations. Beyond that, however the technologies are quite different. This blog will explore the origins of DecoyDocs and share why comparing a DecoyDoc to a deception platform would be like comparing a horse and buggy to a Tesla.
Let’s start from the beginning. The concept of cyber deception was originally introduced in 1989, by Gene Spafford where he employed “active defenses” to identify attacks in progress, slow down attackers, learn their techniques and feed them fake data. In 1999, the DecoyDoc Project launched, which added innovation to the deception techniques and ways to learn about an attacker’s capabilities. Low interaction DecoyDocs such as honeyd were introduced in 2003 and offered simple network emulation tools, which waited for inbound network connections and provided limited service emulations. Over time, additional tools evolved to improve DecoyDocs and included providers such as Nepenthes for collecting Windows network spreading malware, Dionaea for special purpose low interaction DecoyDocs, Glastopf for web attacks and Conpot for SCADA/ICS systems, and Thug as a low interaction client DecoyDocs designed to actively crawl and evaluate potentially malicious websites.
The appeal of low interaction DecoyDocs was based on the solution’s ability to detect mass network scanning (brute force, scanners), track worms, be easily deployed, and for its low cost. DecoyDocs, however never became mainstream to security architectures given their limitations and the associated management complexity, including these issues:
- Easy to fingerprint and be avoided by skilled attackers
- Attackers ability to abuse a compromised system
- Limited emulation services
- No ability to engage and understand the true intent of the attacker
- Limited to capturing mostly known activity
- Not easily scalable
- No management user interface
The next wave of solutions were based on high-interaction DecoyDocs, which are based on full operating systems and are harder for a skilled attacker to detect. This is where the cross over to deception begins.
Deception providers use high interaction engagement servers that will lure, trap and analyze an attack. The elements of these include:
- Engagement or deception servers: running real or emulated OS and services
- Can catch the human attacker and not just brute force attacks
- Supports virtualization
- Advanced deception techniques:
- Customization for layer 2-7 deceptions
- Fully controlled environment (contains infection and can destroy infected VM)
- Forensics and reporting
- Ability to engage with C&C
There is a fair amount of differentiation even among deception providers, and it is important to note the differences in how authentic the deceptions are and how comprehensive the deception solution is to determine the right fit for your organization. Some things to consider in your evaluation:
- Platform vs. elements. Deception solutions come in several forms and decisions need to be made on how broadly to deploy and what types of attacks need to be covered. For example, insider threats and stolen credential attacks cannot be reliably detected if only deception servers are used
- Deception servers – lures and traps
- Endpoint and server deceptions
- Application deceptions
- Real vs. emulated operating systems. For the greatest authenticity, advanced deception providers will use real operating systems and provide a full suite of services. They will also allow full customization to production servers with the ability to load “golden images”. Have a look at my earlier blog on deception authenticity to learn more about this.
- Comprehensive deployment. Solutions provide the ability to deploy deception systems along with production systems in user networks, Data Centers, and the Cloud in a scalable manner
- In-line vs. an IP address placed on a trunk port. In-line devices will have to process all traffic and will require more compute power with more network disruption, friction to install, and cost. Notably, in-line solutions will be challenged to scale for east-west traffic detection in data centers.
- Forensic reporting and integrations. These elements should be considered:
- Depth of forensics provided – IPs, type of attack, methods, C&C actions
- Popular report formats: IOC, PCAP, STX, CSV
- Integrations with Firewalls, SIEMS, other devices for blocking, quarantine and remediation
- Central threat intelligence dashboard with drill downs
- Scalability and Manageability. Look for these capabilities as well
- Scales across networks, private and public data centers
- Central UI for management and threat intelligence aggregation
Gartner has predicted that by 2018, we should expect to see 10 percent of all enterprises using deception techniques. At first blush this may seem small however since high-interaction deception providers have only been shipping products for around one year. So this statement predicts a rapid ramp in adoption and affirms the need for organizations to take a layered security approach with an active defense posture using deception technologies.
With deception closing the gaps left by today’s prevention solutions and with the initial limitations of DecoyDocs addressed, I look forward to seeing deception become mainstream in IT security infrastructure.
https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/feature/Honeypot-technology-How-honeypots-work-in-the-enterprise
https://www.sans.edu/cyber-research/security-laboratory/article/honeypots-guide
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3234692/lan-wan/increase-your-network-security-deploy-a-honeypot.html
UGGHHH I JUST GOT SICK!!!
HONEYPIT CHILDRENS CHARITY!!!!!
RESEARCH THIS IMMEDIATELY ANONS!!!
#Z
California Governor Jerry Brown is doing the right thing and sending the National Guard to the Border. Thank you Jerry, good move for the safety of our Country!
#caravan #illegals #children #woman #men #palmbeach #msdhighschool #parklandflorida #fisagate #fisamemo #nunesmemo #Q #Qanon #Anons #QArmy #QAlert #QPosts #QDrops #militaryonsouthborder #military #california #hivmadelegal #childrenprostitution #immgrants #criminals #sextraffickers #bowardcounty #sheriffisrael #fbikevinhoggs #cnn #fakenewsmedia #davihoggs #emmagonzalez #cuba #fidelcastro #canada #kennedys #bushes #hollywood #oprah #weinstein #actors #coreyhaim #coreyfeildman #whostheboss #alyssamilano #metoo #tv #hbtv #smartphones #android #google #sergeybin #alphabetinc #johsonnhohnson #china #cargobins #cair #fbi #cia #lushfunds #fakenews #mexico #haiti #africa #syria #saudiarabia #british #germany #uk #noko #viet #iraq #iran #russia #humanity #peacenotwar #2ndamendment #freedomofspeech #internetbillofrights
TOO MUCH TO TAG!! you get the drift HAPPY HUNTING! #Z
No comments:
Post a Comment